50 Lawyers To Defend Tinubu Presidential Victory: Can Peter Obi Overturn Results?
50 Lawyers To Defend Tinubu Presidential Victory: Can Peter Obi Overturn Results, The Nigerian presidential election of 2023 has been the centre of attention in recent times. The election was fiercely contested, and there were allegations of rigging and other electoral malpractices. As a result, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and other opposition parties have approached the courts to challenge the results of the election.
On the other hand, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the candidate of the ruling party, has secured the services of 50 lawyers to defend his victory at the Presidential Election Tribunal. This article will focus on the 50 lawyers who are defending Tinubu’s mandate, their qualifications, and their experience.
20 Best Paying Jobs in Basic Industries to Make a Good Career Path in 2023
How many work days in a year? (2023)
Who are the 50 Lawyers Defending Tinubu’s Presidential Victory?
According to , the following senior lawyers are among the 50 lawyers defending Tinubu’s mandate:
- Wole Olanipekun
- Akin Olujimi
- Yusuf Ali
- Lateef Fagbemi
- A.U. Mustapha
- Ahmed Raji
- Abiodun Owonikoko
- Kemi Pinheiro
- Niyi Akintola
- H.M. Liman
- Taiwo Osipitan
- Babatunde Ogala
- Roland Otaru
- James Onoja
- Muiz Banire
- Olusola Oke
- Mohammed Abubakar.
Each of these lawyers has an impressive track record in the legal profession, and they are among the best lawyers in Nigeria.
Wole Olanipekun is a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and the Principal Partner of Wole Olanipekun & Co., a leading law firm in Nigeria. He was called to the Nigerian Bar in 1976 and has since then distinguished himself in the legal profession. Olanipekun is renowned for his advocacy skills and has represented several high-profile clients, including former Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo. He is a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) and has served on several committees, including the Presidential Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution.
Akin Olujimi is also a SAN and a former Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice in Ekiti State. He was called to the Nigerian Bar in 1985 and has been involved in several landmark cases in Nigeria. Olujimi is a member of the Nigerian Body of Benchers, the body responsible for the admission of lawyers into the Nigerian Bar.
Yusuf Ali is a SAN and the Principal Partner of Yusuf O. Ali & Co., a leading law firm in Nigeria. He was called to the Nigerian Bar in 1983 and has been involved in several high-profile cases in Nigeria. Ali is a former Chairman of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Ilorin Branch, and has served on several committees of the NBA.
Lateef Fagbemi is a SAN and the Principal Partner of Fagbemi & Co., a leading law firm in Nigeria. He was called to the Nigerian Bar in 1986 and has been involved in several landmark cases in Nigeria. Fagbemi is a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) and has served on several committees, including the Presidential Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution.
APC sets up legal team to defend mandate
APC Sets Up Legal Team to Defend Mandate: A Closer Look
The All Progressives Congress (APC) has set up a legal team to defend its mandate in the wake of the recently concluded presidential election in Nigeria. The team will be responsible for defending the party’s victory and the mandate given to its presidential candidate, Bola Tinubu. This move by the APC is not entirely surprising, given the opposition’s rejection of the election results and allegations of irregularities. In this article, we will take a closer look at the reasons behind the formation of the legal team, its composition, and the possible implications of the team’s actions.
The 2023 presidential election was one of the most hotly contested in Nigeria’s history. The incumbent, Muhammadu Buhari, was ineligible to run due to term limits, leaving the field open for a new candidate. The two major contenders were Bola Tinubu of the APC and Peter Obi of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP). The election was held on February 25, 2023, and Tinubu emerged as the winner with 37% of the vote. However, Obi and the PDP rejected the results, alleging irregularities and fraud. They also went to court to challenge the outcome of the election.
In response to these allegations, the APC Presidential Campaign Council announced the formation of a legal team to defend the party’s mandate. The team is made up of 50 lawyers who will be responsible for handling the legal challenges and defending the party’s victory.
Composition of the Legal Team
The APC’s legal team is composed of some of the most prominent lawyers in the country. The team is led by Femi Falana, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and a human rights activist. Other members of the team include Abubakar Malami, the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Rotimi Akeredolu, the Governor of Ondo State, and Babatunde Fashola, a former Governor of Lagos State and Minister of Works and Housing. The team is said to be well-equipped to handle any legal challenges and is confident of defending the party’s mandate.
The formation of the legal team by the APC has several implications for Nigeria’s political landscape. First, it shows that the party is not taking the opposition’s allegations lightly and is prepared to defend its victory. This move is also significant because it reinforces the rule of law and the importance of legal institutions in resolving electoral disputes.
Second, the formation of the legal team is likely to prolong the legal battle over the election results. This could lead to a protracted legal process that could further polarize the country and undermine confidence in the electoral process. It could also affect the country’s stability and economic growth.
Third, the formation of the legal team could also deepen the political divide in the country. The opposition is likely to see the move as an attempt by the APC to cling to power and disregard the will of the people. This could lead to further protests and demonstrations, which could potentially lead to violence.
The formation of the legal team by the APC is a significant move in Nigeria’s political landscape. It shows the party’s determination to defend its mandate and reinforces the rule of law in the country. However, it is also likely to prolong the legal battle over the election results and deepen the political divide in the country. It is important that all parties involved in the legal process respect the rule of law and allow the legal institutions to do their job. Only by doing so can Nigeria maintain its stability and build a strong, prosperous democracy.
In conclusion, the APC’s decision to set up a legal team to defend its mandate is a significant development in the country’s political landscape.
CAN PETER OBI SUCCEED TO OVERTURN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION THROUGH THE NIGERIAN COURT
Chapter 1: Introduction
Peter Obi’s emergence as a major player in Nigerian politics has surprised many. Until recently, he was a relatively unknown figure, but by switching parties and appealing to the digitally-savvy youth, he managed to turn the political landscape upside down. Obi’s Labour Party campaign caught the attention of many Nigerians, and polls showed that he was leading the race for the presidency. However, the official results announced that he came in third place, and Obi is now challenging the election result in court, seeking to overturn the victory of the declared winner, Tinubu. This article will examine whether Peter Obi can succeed in overturning the presidential election through the Nigerian court system.
Chapter 2: The Nigerian Court System
The Nigerian court system consists of three tiers: the lower courts, the appellate courts, and the Supreme Court. The lower courts include the Magistrate Courts, the Customary Courts, and the Area Courts. The appellate courts are the High Courts, the Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is the highest court in Nigeria and has the power to adjudicate on election petitions and determine the validity of election results.
Chapter 3: Election Petitions in Nigeria
Election petitions are a common occurrence in Nigeria, and they usually arise from disputes over the outcome of an election. The Electoral Act of 2010 sets out the legal framework for the conduct of elections in Nigeria and provides for the resolution of election disputes. Any aggrieved party can challenge the outcome of an election by filing an election petition within 21 days of the declaration of the results.
Chapter 4: Grounds for Challenging Election Results
The grounds for challenging election results in Nigeria are set out in the Electoral Act of 2010. They include:
- Non-compliance with the Electoral Act
- Non-compliance with the Constitution
- Over-voting or under-voting
- Incomplete result sheets
- Voting outside designated polling stations
- Irregularities in the conduct of the election
Chapter 5: Obi’s Challenge to the Election Result
Peter Obi has stated his intention to challenge the election result in court. He alleges that the election was rigged and that the results were manipulated to favour the declared winner, Tinubu. Obi claims that there were widespread irregularities and that the election was not free and fair. He has assembled a legal team to help him challenge the election result in court.
Chapter 6: Can Obi Succeed in Overturning the Election Result?
The success of Obi’s challenge to the election result will depend on several factors. First, he must prove that there were substantial irregularities in the conduct of the election. This will require evidence of widespread non-compliance with the Electoral Act or the Constitution, over-voting or under-voting, incomplete result sheets, or voting outside designated polling stations. Second, he must show that the irregularities were significant enough to affect the outcome of the election. Finally, he must convince the court that the election was not free and fair.
Chapter 7: Conclusion
Peter Obi’s challenge to the election result in court is a significant development in Nigerian politics. If successful, it could have far-reaching implications for the country’s democracy. However, the outcome of the case is uncertain, and it will depend on the strength of Obi’s evidence and the credibility of his legal team. It is also possible that the case could be drawn out for months, if not years, before a final decision is reached.